- 작성시간 : 2011/12/31 00:00
- 퍼머링크 : picketline.egloos.com/4864073
- 덧글수 : 3
공유하기 버튼
|
|
|
|
Joe Hill's Last Will
By Joe Hill (1879.10.7-1915.9.19)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written in his cell on the eve of his execution
My will is easy to decide,
For there is nothing to divide.
My kind don't need to fuss and moan --
"Moss does not cling to a rolling stone."
My body? Ah, If I could choose,
I would to ashes it reduce,
And let the merry breezes blow
My dust to where some flowers grow.
Perhaps some fading flower then
Would come to life and bloom again.
This is my last and final will.
Good luck to all of you.
Joe Hill (Joseph Hillstrom, Joel Hagglund) was a Swedish-American labor activist, songwriter, and member of the Industrial Workers of the World. In 1915 he was executed for murder after a controversial trial.
He had emigrated to the United States in 1902, where he became a migrant laborer, moving from New York City to Cleveland, Ohio, and eventually to the west coast. He was in San Francisco, California, at the time of the 1906 earthquake. Hill joined the Wobblies around 1910, when he was working on the docks in San Pedro, California. In late 1910 he wrote a letter to the IWW newspaper Industrial Worker, identifying himself as a member of the Portland, Oregon local.
Hill rose in the IWW organization and traveled widely, organizing workers under the IWW banner, writing political songs and satirical poems, and making speeches. His songs frequently appropriated familiar melodies from songs of his time. He coined the phrase "pie in the sky", which appeared in his song The Preacher and the Slave (a parody of the hymn In the Sweet Bye and Bye). Other notable songs written by Hill include The Tramp, There is Power in the Union, Rebel Girl, and Casey Jones: Union Scab.
Joe Hill was an itinerant worker, who moved around the west, hopping freight trains, going from job to job. Early 1914 found Hill working as a laborer at the Silver King Mine in Park City, Utah, not far from Salt Lake City.
On January 10, 1914, John G. Morrison and his son Arling were killed in their Salt Lake City butcher store by two armed intruders masked in red bandannas. Arling had drawn a handgun from behind the counter and wounded one of the masked men before being killed. The police first thought it was a crime of revenge, for nothing had been stolen. The elder Morrison had been a police officer, possibly creating many enemies.
On the same evening, Joe Hill appeared on the doorstep of a local doctor, bearing a bullet wound. Hill said that he had been shot in an argument over a woman, whom he refused to name. The doctor reported that Hill was armed with a pistol.
Considering Morrison's past as a police officer, several men he had arrested were at first considered suspects; twelve people were arrested in the case before Hill was arrested and charged with the murder. A red bandanna was found in Hill's room. The pistol purported to be in Hill's possession at the doctor's office was not found.
Hill resolutely denied that he was involved in the robbery and killing of Morrison. He said that when he was shot, his hands were over his head, and the bullet hole in his coat — four inches below the bullet wound in his back — seemed to support this claim. Hill did not testify at his trial, but his lawyers pointed out that four other people were treated for bullet wounds in Salt Lake City that same night, and that the lack of robbery and Hill's unfamiliarity with Morrison left him with no motive.

The prosecution, for its part, produced a dozen eyewitnesses who said that the killer resembled Hill, including 13-year-old Merlin Morrison, the victims' son and brother, who said "that's not him at all" upon first seeing Hill, but later identified him as the murderer. The jury took just a few hours to find him guilty of murder.
A widely-circulated story is that Hill was in bed with a married woman on the night of the murder. He refused to use this iron-clad alibi, because in Utah in 1914, it would have ruined her reputation and her life. His discretion ended his life.
An appeal to the Utah Supreme Court failed. In a letter to the court, Hill continued to deny that the state had a right to inquire into the origins of his wound, leaving little doubt that the judges would affirm the conviction. Chief Justice Daniel Straup wrote that his unexplained wound was "a distinguishing mark," and that "the defendant may not avoid the natural and reasonable inferences of remaining silent."
In an article for the socialist newspaper Appeal to Reason, Hill wrote:
Owing to the prominence of Mr Morrison, there had to be a 'goat' [scapegoat] and the undersigned being, as they thought, a friendless tramp, a Swede, and worst of all, an IWW, had no right to live anyway, and was therefore duly selected to be 'the goat'.
The case turned into a major media event. President Woodrow Wilson, the blind and deaf author Helen Keller, and people in Sweden all became involved in a bid for clemency. It generated international union attention, and critics charged that the trial and conviction were unfair.
The night before his execution, at about 10:00 pm, Hill passed his will through the bars to a prison guard.
Hill's biographer Gibbs Smith writes in Joe Hillthat the same night, supporters of Hill in Seattle delivered an affidavit to his lawyer. The affiant William Busky wrote he was with Hill for several hours, in a different town working, on the night of the murder; he said Hill was innocent. There were contradictions in the story, but the telegram was forwarded to the Utah governor. The governor asked the Seattle police to arrest Busky. They refused. In the morning prison officials asked Hill if he knew Busky. He did not. Officials decided Busky was not telling the truth and the execution should proceed.
Smith continues:
About 5 a.m. on Friday, November 19, Joe Hill awoke. His actions that morning provided drama to match the rest of the last few months of his life. The day before, Hill had been given a broom with which to clean his cell. When he awoke on Friday morning, he broke the handle of the broom in half, tore up the blankets from his bed, twisted the blanket strips through the bars of his cell door so it could not be opened, then put his mattress against the door. When the guards tried to remove the barrier from the door, Hill jabbed at them with the sharp point of the broken broom handle. The guards broke some brooms and began jabbing at Hill. One guard punched at Hill's stomach with his weapon in an attempt to force him to the rear of the cell while another attempted to remove the barricade from the door. Hill wrested the stick from the guard and was then armed with two weapons. According to the Salt Lake Herald-Republican, the strange duel lasted long enough for Hill to bloody the two guards. The duel was still going on when Sheriff Corless arrived to take Hill from his cell.
When the sheriff approached, Hill quit fighting. Corless, who had developed a friendship with Hill, said, "Joe this is all nonsense."
Hill replied, "What do you mean?"
Corless answered, "You professed to die like a man."
Hill hesitated, then said, "Well I'm through but you can't blame a man for fighting for his life."
The condemend man was taken from his cell and led out into the prison yard. The firing squad was already in the blacksmith's shop, concealed behind a canvas drape cut with five holes for the rifle barrels. Four of the rifles contained bullets -- one held a blank. Hill was placed on a chair located twenty feet in front of the canvas drape. When he sat in the chair, he said rapidly, "I will show you how to die. I will show you how to die, I have a clear conscience." He was strapped in the chair and a mask was placed over his eyes.
Joe Hill's funeral.A doctor held a stethoscope over Hill's heart and located its exact position in his chest. A paper target was put over the spot.
When these preparatory actions were completed, the attending guards stepped back. Joe Hill tossed back his head and tried to see from underneath the mask. He shouted, "I am going now boys. Good-by!" There was no response from anyone. The three men Hill had invited to the execution -- Ed Rowan, George Child, and Fred Ritter -- were not allowed into the prison on orders of the warden. Hill again shouted, "Good-by Boys!"
Deputy Shettler, in charge of the firing squad, began the sequence of commands, preparatory to firing. "Ready, aim," he called out.
Joe Hill shouted, "Fire -- go on and fire," a smile speading over his face.
Shettler commanded "fire" and the rifles cracked. A newsman witnessing the scene reported: "Before the sound of the officer's voice had died, there were five reports, almost in unison, puffs of white smoke came from the curtained window and Hillstrom's chest sank in as though he had been hit with a mighty weight."
The smile faded from Hill's face, his muscles spasmodically contracted, his body stiffened, then relaxed and hung limp in the straps.
![]()
Shortly afterward, one member of the firing squad said:
It seemed like shooting an animal. How my thoughts wandered! It seemed an age waiting for the command to fire. And then, when it came from Hillstrom himself, I almost fell to my knees. We fired. I wanted to close my eyes, but they stared at the white paper heart, scorched and torn by four lead balls. Four blackened circles began to turn crimson, then a spurt and the paper heart was red.
Hill's will electrified the labor movement. Forty-five years later Ethel Raim set it to music. She writes:
I was studying composition with a colleague in 1960 and one of my earliest assignments was to set a text to music. I had always been drawn to the text of Joe Hill's Last Will, and when I sat down to set it to music, the melody came to me in its entirety, and emerged as if it had always belonged to the text. Joe Hill was one of my father's heroes and his most favorite song was Earl Robinson's I Dreamed I Saw Joe Hill Last Night as sung by Paul Robeson. That 78 rpm recording had to have been played hundreds of times on our phonograph during my childhood.
My father, Morrris Goldstein, worked in the needle trades in New York's garment industry for over 45 years. He was a presser and he took great pride in his work. He was also an active rank-and-filer in the ILGWU his entire working life, and to my knowledge, never missed a day of work. During the 50s and 60s, the cutters, pressers, fitters and operators would take turns making coats and suits for the women in their families, which meant that every three or four years my sister, mother and I would alternately get a garment "tailor made" for us; we could select our fabric and choose one of the styles of garments being made in the shop that season by the particular manufacturer. My dad worked in the industry until he was 80, and only retired under pressure from his family. He was 100 and seven months when he left this world.
Joe Hickerson recorded it as an LP in 1976. Two years earlier he was a founding member of the AFSCME Guild at the Library of Congress. He writes:
In fact in spite of the fact that I had just been promoted to the supervisory "management" position of Head of the Archive of Folk Song (where I supervised a staff of two wonderful people), I was enlisted to perform union songs at the first AFSCME event at LC in 1974.
Additional source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Hill.
Personnel: Joe Hickerson, vocals, guitar; Sandy Paton, recording; David Paton, digital remastering.
Purchase the CD.
출처
http://www.labornotes.org/music
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1551459465469&oid=46167377011&comments&ref=mf
|
|
Labor song for the week of November 29, 2010
Middle of the Night
By Jon Fromer

Jon Fromer is a San Francisco-based songwriter. With his gift for bringing people together and making them move, he brings his rhythmically-driven songs of the struggle to concerts, union halls and demonstrations nationwide.
Many of the tapes and CDs featured on BigLabor.com can be purchased through the non-profit, labor-supported Labor Heritage Foundation: http://www.laborheritage.org/

|
|
"The United States has only one choice in dealing with North Korea, even after its deadly artillery attack on a South Korean island," writes Tim Shorrock, an investigative journalist who has covered Korea for more than 30 years. "Negotiate directly with its government, forge an agreement to end Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons program, and move towards a peace agreement to formally end the Korean War." On Wednesday, South Korea found the bodies of two civilians killed in the North Korean attack. The bombardment also killed two South Korean soldiers, wounded 18 others and set dozens of homes ablaze. [includes rush transcript]
Tim Shorrock, investigative journalist and author of Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing.
AMY GOODMAN: South Korea has found the bodies of two civilians killed in the North Korean artillery bombardment Tuesday. The attack also killed two South Korean soldiers, wounded 18 others and set dozens of homes ablaze. UN Secretary Ban Ki-Moon called it one of the gravest incidents since the end of the Korean War in 1953. It began when North Korea said the South ignored repeated warnings not to hold military exercises near the countries’ disputed maritime border. South Korea was holding live fire drills, but said it was not firing towards the north. North Korea responded by shelling the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong. South Korea retaliated by firing 80 rounds of K-9 artillery and placing F-15 fighter jets on alert. Casualties in North Korea are unknown. President Obama telephoned South Korean President Lee Myung-bak on Tuesday to pledge US support. In an interview with Barbara Walters, Obama called the attack “just one more provocative incident” and called on China to take a stand against North Korea. Earlier Tuesday State Department spokesman Mark Toner described the attack as unprovoked.
MARK TONER: I think that everybody involved is stunned by North Korea’s provocative actions. I believe the president referred to it as outrageous and that we are working again within an established framework with our partners so that we have a deliberate approach to this. We will not respond willy-nilly.
AMY GOODMAN: The fighting came just days after was revealed North Korea had made rapid advances in enriching uranium at a previously undisclosed plant. For more, I’m joined by Tim Shorrock, an investigative journalist who has covered Korea for more than 30 years and grew up partly in South Korea. Tim, welcome to "Democracy Now!" First, explain exactly what happened.
TIM SHORROCK: Over the last couple of days, the South Korean military, which is part of a joint command with the U.S. military, held massive exercises in a disputed area, near the disputed maritime zone area on the west coast of Korea. These exercises had been planned months in advance and North Korea of course knew about then. They involved tens of thousands of South Korean soldiers, many warships and air force planes as well as personnel from the U.S. Marines and Air Force. And these exercises, as you said, they are live fire exercises. North Korea, shortly before, in the days leading up to these exercises, warned they would react in shells fell in their line of this maritime line, demarcation line, which they dispute and have disputed for years. Apparently, some shells did land on their side of this line and they retaliated by shelling this island and causing many, you know, some casualties. It was a very serious and grave incident that deserves the very serious and sober analysis, which we have not seen in the U.S. media in the past 24 hours. That is what happened.
AMY GOODMAN: Were you surprised by what has taken place? The media is making a great deal of the North Korean leader taking his young son, heir apparent on a tour of a soy sauce factory while this was going on.
TIM SHORROCK: You’re always kind of surprised when these things happen. But in the context of the last 50 years, it is not really that surprising, particularly if you look at the maritime zone and particularly if you look at the history of U.S.-South Korean military and its standoff with the North Korean regime. First of all, over the last few years, there has increasing tensions over this zone. As I said, this border area in the sea, this border line was imposed unilaterally by the U.S. Navy in 1953 right after the Korean war. That line has never been recognized by North Korea, nor by the international community. A few years ago, under the former presidency of Roh Moo-Hyun, there was actually a meeting, a summit meeting, between the president of South Korea and Kim Jong Il, the dictator of North Korea. They sat down and worked out sort of a set of agreements to try to decrease tensions in that maritime area, including the making of free fishing zones and having discussions to alleviate the attention to make sure there were no incidents like this. This new president Lee is very conservative man who has rejected the former sunshine policies of Kim Dae-Jung and his predecessor, who were much more open and tried to cement closer relationships and end the enmity between North and South Korea. Lee unilaterally pulled away from this agreement. And over the last few years, our listeners and watchers will remember, there have been quite a few incidents. Earlier this year, in March 2010, a South Korean naval ship was blown up allegedly by North Korea by a torpedo and sank, killing about 33 sailors. This was also a very serious incident. And many people who watch North Korea believe that that particular attack, if North Korea did it, was in retaliation for an incident that took place last year when South Korea fired on a North Korean ship that had crossed the line and many North Korean sailors were killed in that attack. And so you know this has been going on. I think the first thing that needs to be done is it would be important to restore some kind of discussion, some kind of negotiation so they can reduce tensions in that specific area.
AMY GOODMAN: This all comes after a US scientist, Stanford professor Siegfried Hecker said, after visiting North Korea, said the officials gave him a tour of a previously undisclosed uranium enrichment plant saying it appears to have more than 1000 centrifuges, saying it appears primarily for civilian nuclear power but added it could be converted to produce highly enriched uranium. The Guardian newspaper is saying international concern was already running high after reports North Korea had developed a new uranium enrichment facility that would give it a source of material for nuclear bombs. Many analysts believe the attack was intended to grab US attention and skew the ground for negotiations over denuclearization in favor of P’yongyang. Tim Shorrock?
TIM SHORROCK: That very well could be. This new uranium plant that the scientists saw, he was quite surprised and startled by the fact they had these modern centrifuges, which they somehow obtained despite this embargo that President Obama and the United Nations have slapped on North Korea. So clearly, sanctions have not worked in deterring from building this plant, which may be, actually could be used for peaceful power or it could later be used to transform it into weapons-grade material for bombs. The question is, what did they do it? They invited three scientists from America to show it to them. Yes, the North Koreans want to have, they have been saying this for years, want to have direct negotiations with the US to end this nuclear standoff. Last week, three independent Americans, two former state department people and an independent social scientist who has gone there many times, met with senior North Korean officials and they were told that North Korea would transfer all of its nuclear material to a third country, its bomb making material to a third country if the US would commit itself to have no hostile intentions toward North Korea, which is something the US has said before in public agreements. So they clearly want to have direct negotiations. Many people who have visited North Korea, including Mr. Hecker who just came back and spoke in Washington yesterday, say we have no choice, really, but to recognize North Korea as a sovereign nation that has its own territorial integrity and interest, despite what you may think about the regime, and that to end this crisis, this nuclear standoff, stop this nuclear bomb program, then we have to negotiate directly with North Korea and reach some agreements. I believe that that could start something that could end—we could have a peace agreement to potentially end the Korean War, which has never ended.
AMY GOODMAN: What do you mean?
TIM SHORROCK: The Korean War ended in 1953 with an armistice. That is not a peace agreement. We are still in a state of war after all of those years. North Korea has been asking for a peace agreement, a formal agreement to actually end the North Korean-US standoff. They are the two parties to the armistice. Of course South Korea would be involved as well. A peace agreement could also deal with these border issues, this line of demarcation, which the North Korean disputes. If he could have some kind of negotiations and come to an agreement to finally end the Korean War, I think that would alleviate a lot of the tension. After all, this is the most militarized border in the world.
AMY GOODMAN: Very quickly: China, where does it fit into this picture?
TIM SHORROCK: China plays a very important role. They are North Korea’s closest ally. They are very concerned about what could happen if North Korea imploded or there was a military … a war or military crisis in the peninsula. They’re very close to the North Korean leadership. Kim Jong-Il and his son have been to China and they have looked at China’s economic development and are studying ways to open up their economy more to capitalist expansion and multinational companies like China has and have some kind of capitalism there to have some economic growth and benefits for the people there. So I think China plays a very important role in terms of trying to alleviate the crisis and moving all sides to some kind of negotiated settlement.
AMY GOODMAN:* Tim, we just have less than a minute, but I wanted to ask you a different question. It’s about the anti-imperialist scholar Chalmers Johnson who just died this past weekend. You wrote a long tribute to him on your site.
*TIM SHORROCK: We Americans, particularly those of us on the left who have studied the American role in the world owe Chalmers Johnson a huge debt for exposing our empire as it is and talking clearly about the huge, enormous expansion of the American military bases around the world and what that means. He was a truthful man. He once supported the Vietnam War and had the courage as an intellectual to come around and say he was wrong. That is a rare thing in America these days. I really hail Chalmers Johnson and praise him for his work and urge your listeners to read his books.?
AMY GOODMAN: Tim Shorrock, I want to thank you very much for you being with us. We will link you our interview, the hour we spent with Chalmers Johnson in 2007. We played an excerpt from it this week. Tim Shorrock, investigative journalist, has covered Korea for more than 30 years. He is author of the book Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/24/tim_shorrock_direct_talks_with_north
|
|
최근 덧글